Skip to content
Georgia Family Law Reform

Putting Children First

  • Home
    • About Founder
    • About GFLR
    • Core Principles
    • Top 10 Changes
    • Top 10 Myths (Georgia)
  • Children
  • Custody
  • Child Support
    • Background
    • Guidelines
      • Policy Decisions
        • Economic Approaches (Model)
        • Estimating Child Rearing Costs
    • Child Support
      • Basic Child Support Obligation
        • Income
          • Low Income
          • High Income
      • Medical Expenses
        • Out-of-Pocket
        • Health Care Premiums
        • Extraordinary Medical Expenses
      • Child Care Expenses
      • Deviations
    • Enforcement/Collection
    • Modification
    • Taxes
    • Duration
  • Courts
    • General
    • Main Players
      • Judges
      • Attorneys
      • Guardian Ad Litems
    • System
      • Discretion
      • Rules of Evidence
      • Constitutional Rights
  • National
    • National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL)
    • National Child Support Enforcement Association (NCSEA)
    • Uniform Law Commission (ULC)
    • Child Support – By State
    • State-By-State Lists
  • Other Topics
    • Fathers
    • Alimony
    • Black Lives Matter
    • Parental Alienation
    • Parenting Time
    • Shared Parenting
    • Georgia
      • Georgia Child Support Guidelines
      • Georgia Commission on Child Support
  • Get Involved
  • DONATE
  1. Bala, N. (2000). The best interests of the child in the post-modern era: A central but paradoxical concept. Paper presentation at the Law Society of Canada Special Lectures 2000, Osgoode Hall, Toronto, Canada.
  2. Bauserman, Robert, 2002, ChildAdjustment in Joint-Custody Versus Sole-Custody Arrangements: A Meta-AnalyticReview.  Journal of Family Psychology,Vol 16, No. 1 91-102.
  3. Cashmore, J., & Parkinson, P. (2011). Parenting arrangements for young children: Messagesfor research. Australian Journal of Family Law, 25, 236–257.
  4. Drozd (Eds.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the Family Court. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  5. Emery, R. (2011, July 23). Custody arrangements for very young children. Retrieved from www.psychology today.com
  6. Emery, R. E. (2007). Rule or Rorschach? Approximating children’s best interests. Child Development Perspectives, 1(2), 132–134.
  7. Erickson, Stephen K., If They Can Do Parenting Plans, They Can Do Child Support Plans, 33WM. MITCHELL L. REv. 827, 844 (2007).
  8. Fabricius, W. (2014, May). Long term correlates of parenting time for infants. Paper presented at Association of Family and Conciliatory Courts Conference, Toronto, Canada. Downloaded by [Wake Forest University Libraries] at 04:12 03 December 2015 628 L. Nielsen
  9. Feldman, R. (2003). Infant–mother and infant–father synchrony: The coregulation positive arousal. Infant Mental Health Journal, 24, 1–23. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0355
  10. Firestone, G., & Weinstein, J. (2004). In the best interests of children: A proposal to transform the adversarial system. Family Court Review, 42(2), 203–215.
  11. Flannery, Michael T., Is “Bird Nesting” in the Best Interest of Children?, 57 SMU L. REV. 295, 324 (2004)
  12. Franklin, K. (2014a, February 23). Child custody lore: The case of the runaway woozle. Retrieved from www.Foresnsicpsychologist.com
  13. Hallas, M. (2013, July 21). New UVA Psyche study shows attachment issues newborns can have. Retrieved from www.NBC29.com
  14. Hamilton, C. (2012). Joint response to: “Co-operative parenting following family separation:Proposed legislation on the involvement of both parents in a child’s life.”
  15. Hughes, R. (2014, March 18). Should infants sleep overnight with nonresidential fathers: The debate continues. Retrieved from www.divorcescience.org
  16. Hutchins, L. (2014, 5 March). Have you woozled a judge? North Carolina Bar Family Law Newsletter, 6.
  17. Kelly, J. (2013, October). Developing parenting plans that benefit children: Current research and practice implications. Paper presented at the Association of Family and Conciliatory Courts Conference, National Harbor, MD.
  18. Kelly, J. B., & Johnston, J. (2005). Empirical and ethical problems with custody recommendations. Family Court Review, 43, 233–241
  19. Klass, J., & Peros, J. (2011). Ten signs of questionable practices in custody evaluations. American Journal of Family Law, 11, 46
  20. Kraus, & J. Galatzer-Levy (Eds.), The scientific basis of child custody decisions (2nd ed.) (pp. 187–214). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  21. Kruk, E. (2008). Child custody, access and parental responsibility: The search for a just and equitable standard. Guelph, Canada: Fatherhood Involvement Research Alliance, Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  22. Lamb, M. (2012a). Critical analysis of research on parenting plans and children’s wellbeing. In K. Kuehnle & L. Drozd (Eds.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the family court (pp. 214–246). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  23. Lamb, M. E., & Kelly, J. B. (2009). Improving the quality of parent-child contact in separating families with infants and young children. In R. M. Galazter-Levy, J.
  24. Lamb, M. E., & Kelly, J. B. (2001). Using the empirical literature to guide the development of parenting plans for young children. Family Court Review, 39(4), 365–371.
  25. Lamb, M. (2012b). A wasted opportunity to engage with the literature on the implications of attachment research for family court professionals. Family Court Review, 50, 481–485. doi:10.1111/fcre.2012.50.issue-3
  26. Ludolph, P. (2012). The special issue on attachment: Overreaching theory and data.
  27. Ludolph, P., & Dale, M. (2012). Attachment in child custody: An additive factor, not a determinative one. Family Law Quarterly, 46, 225–245.
  28. Maccoby, E., & Mnookin, R. (1992). Dividing the children: Social and legal dilemmas of custody. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Downloaded by [Wake Forest University Libraries] at 04:12 03 December 2015 630 L. Nielsen
  29. Mason, M. A. (1996). Read my lips: Trends in judiciary decision-making in custody disputes. Family Law Quarterly, 31(2), 215–236.
  30. McIntosh, J., Pruett, M., & Kelly, J. (2014). Parental separation and overnight care of young children, Part II: Putting theory into practice. Family Court Review, 52, 256–262.doi:10.1111/fcre.2014.52.issue-2
  31. McIntosh, J., Smyth, B., & Kelaher, M. (2013). Overnight care patterns following parental separation: Associations with emotion regulation in infants and young children. Journal of FamilyStudies, 19, 224–239. doi:10.5172/jfs.2013.19.3.224
  32. McIntosh, J., Smyth, B., & Kelaher, M. (2015). Responding to concerns about a study of infant overnight care postseparation, with comments on consensus: Reply to McIntosh, J., Smyth, B., Kelaher, M., & Wells, L. (2011). Post separation parenting arrangements: Patterns and developmental outcomes. Family Matters, 86, 40–48.
  33. Mercer, J. (2014, March 18). Psychozoology in the courtroom: Dodo birds, woozles, heffalumps and parenting. Retrieved from www.childmyths.org
  34. Preidt, R. (2013, July 26). Overnight separation linked to weaker bond. Health Day News. Retrieved from www.healthdaynews.com
  35. Pruett, M., McIntosh, J., & Kelly, J. (2014). Parental separation and overnight care of young children, Part I: Consensus through theoretical and empirical integration. Family Court Review, 52, 240–255. doi:10.1111/fcre.2014.52.issue-2
  36. Samarrai, F. (2013, July 18). Overnights away from home affect children’s attachments, study shows. Retrieved from www.news.virginia.edu
  37. Sokol, K. (2014). Short term consequences of overnight parenting time for infants: Current literature and re-analysis. Association of Family and Conciliatory Courts conference, Toronto, Canada.
Gavel

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 Georgia Family Law Reform | Credits
Powered by Georgia Family Law Reform. The information provided by Georgia Family Law Reform (we, us, or, our) website, is intended solely for general information purposes. All the information displayed on this website is provided in good faith. However, we are not lawyers nor make representations of any kind, express or implied, regarding the validity, accuracy, reliability, availability or completeness of any information on this website (Georgia Family Law Reform).